Deterding v. Newton Correctional Facility et al
| Dustin Michael Deterding |
| Newton Correctional Facility, Scott Miller, Mike Robinson, Iowa Department of Corrections, Kristine Weitzell, Jeremy Larson, Craig Andrews and Kristian Anderson |
| William A Hill |
| 4:2019cv00376 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| James E Gritzner |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Empty Envelope by Dustin Michael Deterding (don) Modified on 12/3/2019 corrected entry #4 this is moot (don). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATION OF INMATE ACCOUNT AND ASSETS by Dustin Michael Deterding re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Dustin Michael Deterding (don) (Main Document 4 replaced on 12/3/2019) corrected paperwork (don). |
| Judge Stephanie M. Rose added. Senior Judge James E. Gritzner no longer assigned to case. (slg) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dustin Michael Deterding. (slg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Dustin Michael Deterding.Motions referred to Helen C. Adams. Responses due by 12/6/2019. (slg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Dustin Michael Deterding. (slg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
