Hilson v. Weitzell
Michael Earl Hilson |
Kris Weitzell |
Kevin Cmelik |
4:2020cv00303 |
October 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Milton Parrott on behalf of Kris Weitzell (Parrott, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Petition or Report by Michael Earl Hilson. Responses due by 12/14/2020. (Booth, Unes) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Unes Jay Booth on behalf of Michael Earl Hilson (Booth, Unes) |
Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Document due by 12/11/2020. Per Order #4 and emailed CJA Panel for appointment of counsel. (don) |
Filing 4 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. Order granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Granting #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 10/26/2020. Copy of Order mailed by chambers to pro se Petitioner. (hfh) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Earl Hilson. (kjw) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Earl Hilson. Responses due by 10/16/2020. (kjw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Earl Hilson. (kjw) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number IAS400022993 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Earl Hilson (don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.