Hakenson v. Clarke et al
| Lynn M. Hakenson |
| City of Waukee, Iowa, Courtney Clarke and John Quinn |
| 4:2020cv00376 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 vp |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Errata attorney signatures re #5 Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan. (Ostergren, Alan) |
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCES. See Order for particulars. Status Conference set for 4/22/2021 10:30 AM in Phone Hearing(HCA). Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1829 and enter code 1176783. Hearing will be held before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams. Status Conference set for 6/22/2021 10:30 AM in Phone Hearing(HCA). Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1829 and enter code 1176783. Hearing will be held before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams. Status Conference set for 8/27/2021 10:30 AM in Phone Hearing(HCA). Counsel shall call 1-877-336-1829 and enter code 1176783. Hearing will be held before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 1/22/2021. (bam)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER ADOPTING #5 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER AND DISCOVERY PLAN: Motions to Add Parties due by 3/12/2021. Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 3/12/2021. Plaintiffs Expert Witness Disclosures due by 5/7/2021. Defendants Expert Witness Disclosures due by 7/2/2021. Plaintiffs Rebuttal Witness Disclosures due by 7/16/2021. Discovery Deadline 8/13/2021. Stipulated Record Deadline 9/10/2021. Plaintiff's Brief due 8/24/2021. Defendants' Brief due by 10/8/2021. Plaintiff's Reply due by 10/15/2021. Defendant's Sur-reply due by 10/22/2021. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 1/22/2021. (bam)
|
| Filing 5 PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER AND DISCOVERY PLAN per scheduling conference with Judge Adams. (Ostergren, Alan) |
| Filing 4 TEXT ORDER: As discussed at the Status Conference held on 1/11/2021, the Parties shall file a modified proposed scheduling order and discovery plan by no later than 1/22/2021. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 1/11/2021. (bam) |
| Filing 3 TEXT MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 1/11/2021. Attorney Alan R. Ostergren appeared for Plaintiff. Attorney Michael C. Richards appeared for Defendants. Status of the case discussed. Separate order to follow. Total Court Time: 8 minutes. (bam) |
| Filing 2 TEXT ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. A Telephonic Scheduling Conference shall be held on 1/11/2021 at 11:00 AM before Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams. Counsel should call 1-877-336-1829 and enter access code 1176783 at the prompt to be joined with the call. The Parties need not file a proposed scheduling order and discovery plan. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 12/10/2020. (bam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Waukee, Iowa, Courtney Clarke, John Quinn from Dallas County District Court, case number EQCV042573. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number 0863-4330433., filed by City of Waukee, Iowa, Courtney Clarke, John Quinn. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 3/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 81(a))(Richards, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
