Ronnau v. Fort Madison State Penitentiary
| Nathan Daniel Ronnau |
| Fort Madison State Penitentiary and Thomas Miller |
| Kevin Cmelik |
| 4:2021cv00120 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Robert W Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas A. Sarcone on behalf of Nathan Daniel Ronnau (Sarcone, Nicholas) |
| ***CJA Attorney Appointment accepted by Attorney Nicholas A. Sarcone for Nathan Daniel Ronnau. (vr) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Counsel shall file an amended petition no later than 7/30/2021. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 6/4/2021. (don)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nathan Daniel Ronnau. (don) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron James Rogers on behalf of Fort Madison State Penitentiary (Rogers, Aaron) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER to Amend Petition by 05/28/2021. 28:2254 Petition form mailed with order to petitioner. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 4/27/2021. (don)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION OF INMATE ACCOUNT AND ASSETS by Nathan Daniel Ronnau (don) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Nathan Daniel Ronnau. (don) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nathan Daniel Ronnau. (don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
