Schultz v. Amazon.com Services, L.L.C.
Plaintiff: Jacob Schultz
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, Inc. doing business as Amazon and Amazon.com Services, L.L.C.
Case Number: 4:2021cv00243
Filed: August 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Helen C Adams
Referring Judge: Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 ad
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2021 Filing 9 TEXT ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant may have to and including 10/12/2021 to file an answer or otherwise respond to complaint. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 9/16/2021. (jsa)
September 15, 2021 Filing 8 Errata PROPOSED ORDER re #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Wood, George)
September 15, 2021 Filing 7 ***MOTION TO EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER***STIPULATION For Extension of Time to Answer/Respond by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Wood, George) Modified on 9/15/2021 (don).
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amazon.com Services, Inc.., filed by Jacob Schultz.(Beck, Amy)
August 23, 2021 Filing 5 TEXT ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant may have to and including 9/23/2021 to file and answer or otherwise respond to #1 complaint. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 8/23/2021. (jsa)
August 23, 2021 Filing 4 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Amazon.com Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Wood, George) Modified on 8/23/2021 (jsa) to change to Motion.
August 20, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Amazon.com Services, LLC Local Rule 81 Notice (Wood, George)
August 20, 2021 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure/Statement of Interest by Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Wood, George)
August 20, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Amazon.com Services, LLC from Polk, case number LACL150636. Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number 0863-4577041., filed by Amazon.com Services, LLC. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 11/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wood, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schultz v. Amazon.com Services, L.L.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacob Schultz
Represented By: Madison Elizabeth Fiedler-Carlson
Represented By: Amy Rachelle Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, Inc. doing business as Amazon
Represented By: George R Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, L.L.C.
Represented By: George R. Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?