Lindsay v. Schwartz, et al
Petitioner: Michael Miles Lindsay
Respondent: Ann Schwartz, Stacy Good, Cathy Perry, Stephany Newkirk, Nichole Francis, Stephanie Schmidt, Daniel Forbes, Franklin Selden, John Doe, Jane Doe, Jane Doe-1 and Jane Doe-2
Case Number: 4:2021cv00245
Filed: August 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Referring Judge: Stephen B Jackson
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2021 Filing 29 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Michael Miles Lindsay.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 10/6/2021. (btg)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Setting Dispositive Motion Deadline. Dispositive motion deadline is set for 12/20/2021. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 9/10/2021. Copy of order mailed by chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (hfh)
September 3, 2021 Filing 27 ANSWER to #23 Amended Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Stacy Good, Stephany Newkirk, Cathy Perry, Ann Schwartz.(Siefert, Nicholas)
August 20, 2021 Filing 26 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00029. Original file
August 20, 2021 Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger and Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr added. (kjw)
August 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER re #23 Pro Se Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay. This case is transferred forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. #24 Order Appointing Counsel is vacated so as to allow the Southern District of Iowa to make its own determination as to whether the appointment of counsel is appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 8/19/2021. (eCJA, eRP, ePDY, copy w/NEF mailed to plaintiff) (sgw)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 (VACATED) ORDER granting #20 Pro Se Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying without prejudice #21 Pro Se Motion for Discovery; denying without prejudice #22 Pro Se Motion for Subpoena filed by Michael Miles Lindsay. Within thirty (30) days of Lindsay's counsel entering an appearance, the parties shall contact the chambers of Hon. Kelly K.E. Mahoney, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, to schedule a status conference to establish a briefing schedule. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 8/3/2021 (eCJA, eRP, ePDY, copy w/NEF mailed to Plt). (skm) Modified to note Order Vacated per Order at #25 on 8/19/2021 (sgw).
July 16, 2021 Filing 23 PRO SE AMENDED Complaint against Ann Schwartz, Stacy Good, Cathy Perry, Stephany Newkirk, filed by Michael Miles Lindsay. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh)
July 2, 2021 Filing 22 PRO SE MOTION for Subpoena by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay. (PSLC)(NEF mailed to filer) (kms)
June 11, 2021 Filing 21 PRO SE MOTION For Discovery by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay (PSLC) (NEF to Plf) (jag)
June 7, 2021 Filing 20 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Plt). (skm)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order granting #16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Nichole Francis, Stephanie Schmidt, Daniel Forbes and Franklin Selden. Those defendants are hereby dismissed from this case. The claims against physician John Doe and pharmacist Jane Doe are hereby dismissed. The claims against defendants Jane Doe-1 and Jane Doe-2 remain pending at this time. Iowa Attorney Generals Office shall provide plaintiff any available discoverable material that may assist him in identifying defendants Jane Doe-1 and/or Jane Doe-2. Plaintiff file an amended complaint that states the actual names within 60 days. Alternatively, plaintiff may file a notice stating he remains unable to identify Jane Doe-1 or Jane Doe-2. If plaintiff fails to comply with these requirements, this action will be dismissed for failure toprosecute. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 6/1/2021. (copy w/nef mailed to plaintiff) (des)
May 13, 2021 Filing 18 PRO SE Correspondence by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay. (PSLC) (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (sgw)
October 1, 2020 Filing 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendants Daniel Forbes, Nicole Francis, Stephanie Schmidt, Franklin Stedson Responses due by 10/22/2020 (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Statement of Material Facts) (Siefert, Nicholas)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion to file appendix under seal. Defendants may file their appendix in support of motion for summary judgment under seal. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 10/1/2020. (mmc)
October 1, 2020 Filing 14 MOTION to file under Seal Appendix by Defendants Daniel Forbes, Nicole Francis, Stephanie Schmidt, Franklin Stedson (Siefert, Nicholas)
June 11, 2020 Filing 13 MAIL Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Michael Lindsay which included #12 Scheduling Order (Sec 1983). No fwd address. (ksy)
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING Order (Sec 1983): Discovery due by 9/1/2020. Motions due by 10/1/2020. Narrative Written Statement due by 11/2/2020. Signed by Clerk on 6/1/2020. (Order mailed to plaintiff) (pac)
May 29, 2020 Filing 11 ANSWER to #5 Amended Complaint by Daniel Forbes, Nicole Francis, Stephanie Schmidt, Franklin Stedson.(Siefert, Nicholas)
May 20, 2020 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Daniel Forbes, Stephanie Schmidt, Nicole Francis, Franklin Stedson. Daniel Forbes waiver sent on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020; Stephanie Schmidt waiver sent on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020; Nicole Francis waiver sent on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020; Franklin Stedson waiver sent on 3/30/2020, answer due 5/29/2020. (Siefert, Nicholas)
May 8, 2020 Filing 9 MAIL Returned as Undeliverable - Return to Sender - Unable to Forward. Mail sent to Michael Miles Lindsay which included #7 Order w/nef. Iowa Department of Corrections offender search shows Mr. Lindsay is on work release. (des)
May 1, 2020 Set Deadline: If no response or waiver filed let MW know by 5/15/2020. (ksy)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER to File and Serve. #1 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Amended Complaint field at #5 . Prisoner Michael Miles Lindsay pay Initial partial Filing Fee of 20% (see Order text). Clerk of Court directed to serve the complaint on defendants via certified mail care of Iowa Attorney General's Office. Waiver of Service sent to Defendants on 3/30/2020. Waiver of Service due by 4/29/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 3/30/2020. (Copy w/ NEF mailed to Pro Se Plf, Notice of Collection mailed to Warden, copy w/NEF and Amended Complaint mailed via certified mail to Iowa Attorney General's Office. (jag) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/7/2020: #1 Return Receipt) (jag).
August 12, 2019 Filing 6 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #5 Amended Complaint by Michael Miles Lindsay. (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (pac)
August 2, 2019 Filing 5 PRO SE AMENDED Complaint against All Defendants filed by Michael Miles Lindsay. Filed per direction from PSLC. NEF mailed to filer. (src)
August 1, 2019 Filing 4 PRO SE MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay. Filed per direction from PSLC. NEF mailed to filer. (Attachments: #1 Documents In Support) (src)
May 1, 2019 Filing 3 Correspondence by Michael Miles Lindsay (NEF w/reply and docket sheet mailed to Plt). (skm)
March 20, 2019 Filing 2 PRO SE MOTION for Discovery by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay (ksy)(NEF to Plf)
March 6, 2019 Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Michael Miles Lindsay (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (NEF mailed to Pltf per PSLC) (jjh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindsay v. Schwartz, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Miles Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ann Schwartz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stacy Good
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cathy Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stephany Newkirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nichole Francis
Represented By: Nicholas Easton Siefert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stephanie Schmidt
Represented By: Nicholas Easton Siefert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Forbes
Represented By: Nicholas Easton Siefert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Franklin Selden
Represented By: Nicholas Easton Siefert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Doe-1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Doe-2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?