Ireland v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Susan Ireland |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Department of Homeland Security and US Citizenship and Immigration Services |
4:2022cv00139 |
April 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
Stephen B Jackson |
Mandamus & Other |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Susan Ireland. Department of Homeland Security served on 5/6/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Etchells, Elizabeth) Modified on 5/10/2022 corrected type of service USA and answer due date (kjw). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to USA by Susan Ireland. US Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 5/6/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Etchells, Elizabeth) Modified on 5/10/2022 corrected type of service USA and answer due date (kjw). |
Filing 2 Summons: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons. (btg) (btg). |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-4803739., filed by Susan Ireland. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Petition, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5)(Etchells, Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.