Sheriff v. United States of America et al
| Nehwon D. Saih Sheriff |
| United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Marta Nickols, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Attorney General of the United States and Department of Homeland Security |
| 4:2022cv00153 |
| May 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin David Bergmann on behalf of Nehwon D. Saih Sheriff (Bergmann, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Ray Lawrence on behalf of Attorney General of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, United States of America (Lawrence, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Summons: Counsel should download the attached summons in compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nehwon Saif Sheriff Filing fee paid in the amount of $ 402, receipt number AIASDC-4812011., filed by Nehwon Saif Sheriff. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 8/1/2022.(Bergmann, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
