Foy v. Ault et al
Earl Lee Foy, Jr. |
John Ault, Dave DeGrange and Traci Dow-Wyatt |
Earl Foy, Jr |
David Larson |
William A. Hill and H. Loraine Wallace |
4:2022cv00210 |
June 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Helen C Adams |
Robert W Pratt |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Earl Lee Foy, Jr. (kjw) |
Filing 4 PRESCREENING ORDER Amended Complaint due by 7/29/22. Signed by Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt on 6/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Inmate Account, #2 Motion IFP) (don) |
Filing 3 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 5:22-cv-04032. Original file |
Filing 2 ORDER of Case Transfer re #1 Complaint filed by Earl Foy, Jr: Case electronically transferred to the Southern District of Iowa. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 6/27/2022. (copy mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
Senior Judge Robert W. Pratt and Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams added. (btg) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Plaintiff Earl Foy, Jr. Dismissal Deadline 10/3/2022. (nef mailed to plaintiff) (des) |
Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.