Lloyd v. Telleen et al
| Lamont Lloyd |
| John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones, Joey Hoover, Christopher Kragnes, Davenport Public Defenders Office, Black Hawk County Jail, Lt. Newman, Julie Lien, Vigil and Aneweer |
| 4:2022cv00223 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams added. Magistrate Judge Stephen H. Locher(MJ) no longer assigned to case. (pll) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT in favor of Davenport Public Defenders Office, Christopher Kragnes, Derek G. Jones, Joey Hoover, John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson against Lamont Lloyd. Signed by Clerk John S. Courter on 7/20/2022. (btg) |
Filing 3
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing case. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 7/19/2022. (r) Paper copy of order mailed this day to Lamont Lloyd #6864926 IOWA STATE PENITENTIARY P.O. Box 316 Fort Madison, IA 52627
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lamont Lloyd. (Attachments: #1 2nd MIFP) (don) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Lamont Lloyd. (don) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
