Albert et al v. Albert et al
| Brian James Albert and Bradley James Albert |
| James Author Albert and Beatty & Miller Law Firm |
| 4:2022cv00396 |
| November 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Stephanie M Rose |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT/ADDENDUM #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by James Author Albert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Brown, David) |
| Filing 15 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Beatty & Miller Law Firm. Responses due by 2/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit)(Bower, David) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian James Albert, Bradley James Albert. Beatty & Miller Law Firm served on 12/19/2022, answer due 1/9/2023. (kjw) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian James Albert, Bradley James Albert. James Author Albert served on 12/30/2022, answer due 1/20/2023. (kjw) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Recusal and Supplement to #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel by Bradley James Albert, Brian James Albert.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 2/3/2023. (kjw) |
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER FOR L.R. 7(k) STATEMENT: Pursuant to Local Rule 7(k), counsel for Defendant James Arthur Albert shall confer with Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendant Beatty & Miller Law Firm as to whether they consent to the Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead #9 and then file a supplement to the motion by no later than January 25, 2023 indicating their position. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. on 1/18/2023. (jeb)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE by James Author Albert . (Brown, David) Modified on 1/20/2023 linked to motion #9 (kjw). |
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by James Author Albert.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. (Brown, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David L. Brown on behalf of James Author Albert (Brown, David) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #2 Plaintiffs' Motion to File Documents With Pacer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. on 1/6/2023. (jeb)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Defendant Beatty & Miller Law Firm has until January 23, 2023 to file an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. on 1/6/2023. (jeb)
|
| Filing 5 Unresisted MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by Beatty & Miller Law Firm.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. (Bower, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by David T. Bower on behalf of Beatty & Miller Law Firm (Bower, David) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brian James Albert.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 12/13/2022. (btg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to File Documents with Pacer by Bradley James Albert, Brian James Albert.Motions referred to Stephen B. Jackson, Jr. Responses due by 12/13/2022. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Author Albert, Beatty & Miller Law Firm, filed by Brian James Albert, Bradley James Albert. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 2/27/2023. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 2/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (btg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
