Ruthers v. Turner
Petitioner: Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr.
Respondent: Cory Turner
Case Number: 4:2023cv00018
Filed: January 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2023 Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Iowa Northern; Case Number 1:22-cv-00161. Original file
January 13, 2023 Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger added. (kjw)
January 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER of Case Transfer: The Clerk's office is directed to send the entire file to the Southern District of Iowa, and retain a copy of the file for its records. Case electronically transferred to Southern District of Iowa. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 1/12/2023. (kms) Modified on 1/12/2023 to note Order mailed to Pet)(kms).
January 9, 2023 Filing 5 PRO SE RESPONSE re #3 Order by Thomas G Ruthers, Jr. (mmc)(PSLC)(NEF/2254 form mailed to Pet)
January 4, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Milton Parrott on behalf of Cory Turner. (Parrott, Benjamin) Modified on 1/5/2023 to remove docket text of withdraw of Diane Murphy Smith (klh).
December 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas G Ruthers, Jr : If Ruthers objects to the court considering this case as being brought pursuant to 2254, he must file an objection within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 12/29/2022. (ksy)(copy to Pet)
December 27, 2022 FILING FEE Receipt: $5.00, receipt number 227 (JLH)
December 21, 2022 Filing 2 PRO SE ADDENDUM to #1 Pro Se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Thomas G Ruthers, Jr (Attachments: #1 Attachment 2, #2 Attachment 3, #3 Attachment 4, #4 Attachment 5, #5 Attachment 6, #6 Attachment 7, #7 Attachment 8, #8 Attachment 9, #9 Attachment 10, #10 Attachment 11, #11 Attachment 12, #12 Attachment 13, #13 Attachment 14, #14 Attachment 15, #15 Attachment 16) (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Petitioner) (JLH)
December 21, 2022 Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas G Ruthers, Jr. Dismissal Deadline 4/3/2023 (Attachments: #1 Habeas Attachment 1, #2 Habeas Attachment 2, #3 Habeas Attachment 3, #4 Habeas Attachment 4, #5 Habeas Attachment 5, #6 Habeas Attachment 6, #7 Habeas Attachment 7, #8 Habeas Attachment 8, #9 Habeas Attachment 9, #10 Habeas Attachment 10, #11 Habeas Attachment 11, #12 Habeas Attachment 12, #13 Habeas Attachment 13) (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Petitioner) (JLH)
December 21, 2022 Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (JLH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ruthers v. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas G. Ruthers, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cory Turner
Represented By: Benjamin Milton Parrott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?