Cook v. Stroud
Daniel Lee Cook |
Marcy Stroud |
Aaron Rogers |
4:2023cv00031 |
January 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
Stephanie M Rose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER of USCA to submit documents as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel Lee Cook. (vr) |
Filing 13 ORDER of USCA advising appellate is directed to pay fee or motion for IFP to avoid dismissal as to #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel Lee Cook. (vr) |
Filing 12 USCA Case Number 23-1354 for #10 Notice of Appeal filed by Daniel Lee Cook. (vr) |
Filing 11 NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL and NOA Supplement by District Court Clerk to USCA re #10 Notice of Appeal filed on 2/17/2023. (vr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #7 Order by Daniel Lee Cook. (btg) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT #1 by Daniel Lee Cook. (btg) |
Filing 8 JUDGMENT in favor of Marcy Stroud against Daniel Lee Cook. Signed by Clerk John S. Courter on 2/3/2023. (btg) |
Filing 7 ORDER: For the reasons discussed in the Order, the case is dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. Signed by Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose on 2/2/2023. (rnm) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:23-cv-00004. Original file |
Chief Judge Stephanie M. Rose added. (kjw) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Accordingly, the Court denies as moot Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail to Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet in this closed action. The Court further orders that Plaintiff must file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his case directly with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division. Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/23/23. (JAB) Remark: Copy of docket sheet and order mailed to plaintiff. |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petitioner Daniel Lee Cook. (LNJ) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER: For the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Order entered this same date, the Court orders the transfer of this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division. (Case to be transferred after 1/23/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/9/2023. (CLT) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court directs the Clerk to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, Davenport Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a). SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (Case to be transferred after 1/23/2023.) Signed by Chief District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 1/9/2023. (CLT) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 2,3. Mon Jan 9 14:51:41 CST 2023 (Thoele, Cassandra) |
Filing 1 Document entitled "PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM A CONVICTION OR SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN STATES CUSTUDY" docketed as PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY by Petitioner Daniel Lee Cook. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DLB) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jan 3 15:00:47 CST 2023 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.