Bom v. Kansas City Sausage Company LLC
| Machul David Bom |
| Kansas City Sausage Company LLC and Kansas City Sausage Company LLC doing business as Pine Ridge Farms |
| 4:2023cv00118 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons/Corporate Disclosure Packet Note: Counsel should download the attached summons and/or corporate disclosure packet, if applicable. In compliance with Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure for summons and Local Rule 7.1 for the disclosure statements. (Attachments: #1 LR 7.1 Packet) (bp - Copy mailed to Plaintiff.) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 5/12/2023. Copy of order mailed by chambers to plaintiff. (h)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Machul David Bom. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kansas City Sausage Company LLC, filed by Machul David Bom. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 7/10/2023. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 7/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement) (btg) (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/21/2023) (btg). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
