Hindson v. Commonwealth Financial Services
| Tomika Hindson |
| Commonwealth Financial Services doing business as Northeast Credit and Collections and CT Corporation System |
| 4:2023cv00239 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| William P Kelly |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tomika Hindson. Commonwealth Financial Services served on 8/28/2023, answer due 9/18/2023. (kjw) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tomika Hindson re #3 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint to U.S. Marshals for service. (kjw) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The United States Marshal for the Southern District of Iowa shall serve the Complaint upon the Defendant without prepayment of fees and costs. Signed by Judge Stephen H. Locher on 7/27/2023. (lcw)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tomika Hindson. (btg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commonwealth Financial Services, filed by Tomika Hindson. Notice of Dismissal for lack of Service deadline set for 10/16/2023. Rule 16 Notice of Dismissal set for 10/16/2023. (btg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
