Dooly v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Shad Dooly |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 4:2023cv00498 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Helen C Adams |
| Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Pursuant to Rules 6, 7, and 8 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security, Plaintiff's brief is due on or before 3/6/2024. Defendant's brief is due on or before 4/5/2024. Plaintiff's reply brief is due on or before 4/19/2024. The Court will deem this matter ready for submission on 4/19/2024, or upon timely filing of the reply brief, whichever occurs first. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams on 2/5/2024. (k)
|
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT (SOCIAL SECURITY). (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Part 9, #9 Part 10, #10 Part 11, #11 Part 12, #12 Part 13, #13 Part 14, #14 Part 15, #15 Part 16, #16 Part 17, #17 Part 18, #18 Part 19, #19 Part 20, #20 Part 21, #21 Part 22, #22 Part 23, #23 Part 24, #24 Part 25, #25 Part 26, #26 Part 27)(Scherle, Rachel) |
|
Filing 7
REFERENCE ORDER. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 12/12/2023. (h)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before US Magistrate by Commissioner of Social Security. (Scherle, Rachel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel J. Scherle on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Scherle, Rachel) |
| Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams added. Chief Magistrate Judge Helen C. Adams, as referral judge and Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger no longer assigned to case. (bp) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 12/11/2023. (h)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See order for particulars. Signed by Judge Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger on 12/11/2023. (h)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shad Dooly. (Barnett, Gail) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Shad Dooly.(Barnett, Gail) Modified on 12/8/2023 (bp - Correct party and resent NEF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dooly v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shad Dooly | |
| Represented By: | Gail Lynn Barnett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Rachel J. Scherle |
| Represented By: | SSA-Office of the General Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
