Hardin v. Skinner et al
| Erik D. Hardin |
| Beth Skinner, Marcy Stroud, Dave Smith, Nick Pietz and Iowa Department of Corrections |
| H. Loraine Wallace |
| 4:2024cv00148 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa |
| Stephen B Jackson |
| Stephen H Locher |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Erik D. Hardin. (btg) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Erik D. Hardin. (btg) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO AMEND: By no later than June 21, 2024, Hardin shall amend his complaint as outlined in the Order. Also by June 21, 2024, Hardin shall either pay the full filing fee or return the forms to proceed without prepayment of fees. Failure to respond to this Order as directed may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute and comply with a court order. Signed by Judge Stephen H. Locher on 5/20/2024. Order mailed to Hardin by chambers. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, #2 Certificate of Inmate Accounts) (mm)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Iowa Department of Corrections, Nick Pietz, Beth Skinner, Dave Smith, Marcy Stroud, filed by Erik D. Hardin. (nla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
