Rosario v. Prindle et al
Petitioner: Manuel De Jesus Familia Rosario
Respondent: Edward Prindle, Michael A. Helmig, Ricardo Wong, Janet Napolitano and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00217
Filed: September 2, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Covington Office
County: Boone
Presiding Judge: William O. Bertelsman
Presiding Judge: Candace J. Smith
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 8 U.S.C. ยง 1105
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER: 1) The objections to the 23 Report and Recommendation are overruled; 2) Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; 3) The Respondents' motion to dismiss 19 is d enied; 4) The Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted in part to the extent he requests the Immigration Court hold an individualized bond hearing; and denied in part as to his request for immediate release an d for an award of atty's fees; and 5) This matter is hereby remanded to the Immigration Court to provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing w/in 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 1/4/2012. (ECO)cc: COR, cc of Order mailed this date to United States Immigration Court, 536 S. Clark St., Room B-1320/1330, Chicago, IL 60605. Modified to add cc on 1/4/2012 (ECO).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rosario v. Prindle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Manuel De Jesus Familia Rosario
Represented By: Brent T. Asseff
Represented By: Iris E. Bennett
Represented By: Garrett A. Levin
Represented By: Charles Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Edward Prindle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael A. Helmig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ricardo Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Janet Napolitano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?