River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc. et al v. Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees
Plaintiff: River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc., John W. Arnold, James David Wood, Gary W. Simkins and James K. Larkin
Defendant: Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees
Movant: William M. Kerrick
Case Number: 3:2017cv00102
Filed: December 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Office: Frankfort Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Gregory F. VanTatenhove
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1395
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff Arnold be awarded an additional $6,504.00, and that Plaintiff Simkins be awarded $83,168.98. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 6/3/2020.(CBD)cc: COR (Main Document 72 replaced on 6/3/2020) (CBD).
February 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiffs' request 56 for damages is GRANTED IN PART. A. Plaintiff Arnold is awarded $3,090.48 to reimburse him for health insurance premiums he should not have had to pay. Plaintiff Arnold is DIRECTED to s ubmit proof of what it would have cost him to obtain substitute health insurance had he mitigated his damages and purchased health insurance through the Jefferson County Sheriff's Office from January 1, 2017, through July 17, 2019. B. Plaintiff Simkin is DIRECTED to submit proof of what it would have cost him to obtain comparable health insurance on the open market from December 3, 2015, to July 17, 2019. C. Plaintiff Larkin is awarded $6,181.92 to reimburse him for health insurance p remiums he paid after Defendant canceled his health insurance. D. Plaintiff Wood is awarded $4,033.61 to reimburse him for health insurance premiums he paid after Defendant canceled his health insurance. The requested proof should be filed withi n THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. After Plaintiffs submit the requested proof, Defendant will have TWENTY DAYS from the date of Plaintiffs filing to respond with objections and Plaintiffs will then have TEN days from the filing of any objections to file a reply. The Court will enter a judgment following the submission of the additional proof and briefing. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 2/18/2020.(CBD)cc: COR
March 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: (1) Defendant's motion 12 for summary judgment is DENIED; (2) Plaintiffs' cross-motion 21 for partial summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART as to Count II of the Amended Complaint and DENIED IN PART in all other respects; (3) Plaintiffs' federal claim (Count V) is DISMISSED with prejudice; (4) William M. Kerrick's motion to intervene (Doc. 1-6) is GRANTED; and (5) The parties shall confer regarding the appropriate remedies in this matter and file a joint status report on or before April 22, 2019. Signed by Judge William O. Bertelsman on 3/21/2019.(CBD)cc: COR
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc. et al v. Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc.
Represented By: David Leightty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John W. Arnold
Represented By: David Leightty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James David Wood
Represented By: David Leightty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary W. Simkins
Represented By: David Leightty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James K. Larkin
Represented By: David Leightty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees
Represented By: Peter Matthew Cummins
Represented By: Samuel W. Wardle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: William M. Kerrick
Represented By: Lyn Taylor Long
Represented By: C. Mike Moulton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?