Cases
River City Fraternal Order, et al v. Kentucky Retirement Systems We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5778
Intervenor / Appellee: WILLIAM M. KERRICK
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN W. ARNOLD, JAMES DAVID WOOD, GARY W. SIMKINS and others
Defendant / Appellant: KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, by and through its Board of Trustees
River City Fraternal Order, et al v. Kentucky Retirement Systems We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5773
Intervenor / Appellee: WILLIAM M. KERRICK
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOHN W. ARNOLD, JAMES DAVID WOOD, GARY W. SIMKINS and others
Defendant / Appellant: KENTUCKY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, by and through its Board of Trustees
River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc. et al v. Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00102
Plaintiff: River City Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 614, Inc. , John W. Arnold , James David Wood and others
Defendant: Kentucky Retirement Systems by and through its Board of Trustees
Movant: William M. Kerrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Arnold et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv10703
Plaintiff: John W. Arnold
Defendant: Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Natzke et al v. United States of America
as 1:2011cv00579
Plaintiff: Brian P. Natzke , Virginia J. Arnold and John W. Arnold
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
John W. Arnold, Sr v. Ford Motor Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-68248
Plaintiff: John W. Arnold, Sr
Defendant: Ford Motor Co
ARNOLD, SR v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68248
Plaintiff: JOHN W ARNOLD, SR
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?