Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
| Anthony W. Austin |
| Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty, Phillip Ray and Logan Curry |
| John Does |
| 3:2022cv00068 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER :Motion #9 is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiffshall have up to and including 2/7/2023, to respond to the Defendants Motions toDismiss.This. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 2/1/2023.(CBD)cc: COR
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #9 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan M. Doty , #4 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Logan Curry, Franklin County, Kentucky, Phill (CBD)
|
|
Filing 9
UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan M. Doty , #4 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Logan Curry, Franklin County, Kentucky, Phillip Ray, Phillip Ray , #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Chris Quire, Chris Quire by Anthony W. Austin (Hawkins, Douglas)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion [R. #7 ] is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 1/25/2023, to respond to the Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Gregory F. Van Tatenhove on 1/9/2023.(JJ)cc: COR
|
|
NOTICE OF ACTION BY CLERK DELETING A ENTRY FROM THE RECORD: Notice of Deficiency entered 1/9/2023 was entered in error and has been deleted. *CBD* cc: COR (CBD)
|
|
***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Judge Van Tatenhove for review: re #7 Proposed Agreed Order for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (CBD)
|
|
Filing 7
PROPOSED AGREED ORDERN for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan M. Doty , #4 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Logan Curry, Franklin County, Kentucky, Phillip Ray, Phillip Ray , #5 MOTION to Dismiss by Chris Quire, Chris Quire by Anthony W. Austin (Hawkins, Douglas) Modified text on 1/9/2023 (CBD).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Nathan M. Doty (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Hunt, William)
|
|
Attorney Update. Attorney William Scott Hunt for Nathan M. Doty added. (CBD)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION to Dismiss by Chris Quire, Chris Quire (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Cole, Charles)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim by Logan Curry, Franklin County, Kentucky, Phillip Ray, Phillip Ray (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Stilz, D.)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Logan Curry, Franklin County, Kentucky, Phillip Ray, Phillip Ray. (Zellen, Lynn)
|
|
Case no longer referred to PSO. (CBD)
|
|
Conflict Check run. (CBD)
|
|
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Notice of Removal (CBD)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin Circuit Court, case number 22-CI-908. ( Filing fee $402; receipt number AKYEDC-5430016), filed by Chris Quire. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, #2 State Court Record Docket Sheet, #3 State Court Record Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(CBD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
