Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Moore v. McFarling, et al.
as 4:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
Henry Moore
Defendant:
Judge FNU McFarling, Dr Kristi Compton, Dr FNU Goodness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LINDSEY v. MYERS et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RAY LINDSEY
Defendant:
WARDEN DARRIN MYERS, WARDEN JEFFRIES, WARDEN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Christopher David
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire and Phillip Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. DG Darlington, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Adam Phillip Ray Gibson
Defendant:
DG Darlington, LLC and Dolgencorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
EVANS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14098
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP RAY EVANS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark et al v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Deputy Phillip Ray, Sgt. Nathan Doty, Franklin County, Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Maysia Harris and Hannah Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Ensite USA, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00384
Defendant:
Ensite USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodgers v. Owens et al
as 2:2021cv02270
Defendant:
Creig Pickles, Doe and Owens
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
