Cox v. Crowe
| Charles Christopher Cox |
| James Crowe, Ernest Farmer, Woody Tipton, Janice Bush, Tim Burkhart, William Bill Eckler, City Of Irvine, Thomas Tommy Bryant and William Bill Arthur |
| 5:2009cv00005 |
| January 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Estill |
| Jennifer B Coffman |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: DENYING dft's 79 MOTION to Reconsider. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 8/26/11.(KJR)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: dft's 53 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Cox's procedural due process & freedom of association claims; DENIED as to Cox's freedom of speech claim and dft's claim to qualified immunity. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 1/5/2011.(STB)cc: COR
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER: Dfts' 5 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART in accordance w/ this opinion; all claims relating to civil conspiracy & substantive due process are DISMISSED; only claims that remain involve events that occurred after 1/6/2008 & concern plt's First Amendment & procedural due process claims. Signed by Judge Jennifer B Coffman on 6/3/2009.(STB)cc: COR
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
