Goddard v. United States Of America
Plaintiff: Calvin Lee Goddard
Defendant: United States Of America and USA
Case Number: 5:2020cv00180
Filed: April 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Presiding Judge: P SO
Referring Judge: Henry R Wilhoit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: 1. Goddard's #1 Complaint is DENIED w/out prejudice and STRICKEN from the Court's docket; 2. Clerk shall send Goddard a Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY 520] and Motion for IFP [EDKY519]; 3. Goddard may file a new action re this matter. Goddard must fully complete the EDKY 520 form, SIGN HIS SUBMISSION(AND SUPPORTING STATEMENT), and file w/ the Court. Goddard must either pay filing fee or file Motion for IFP. Signed by Judge Henry R. Wilhoit, Jr on 5/1/2020.(SLH)cc: COR and Goddard by US Mail (Order along w/ EDKY 520 & EDKY 519)
April 30, 2020 Filing 5 STANDING ORDER re: Disclosure of Contact Information: 1. pro se litigants must provide current telephone number, residential address, & if different, mailing address. 2. pro se litigants must provide written notice of change of residential address, & if different, mailing address. 3. Clerk file copy of Order in all non-prisoner pro se actions. Failure to provide required information or change of address may result in appropriate sanctions. (GLD)cc: CORand Goddard by US Mail
April 30, 2020 Filing 4 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer Goddard via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample caption)(GLD)
April 30, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Calvin Lee Goddard, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (GLD)
April 30, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO,, filed by Calvin Lee Goddard, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Claim, #2 Exhibit - Tort Claim documentation, #3 Envelope postmarked 4/28/2020)(GLD)
April 30, 2020 Conflict Check run. (GLD)
April 30, 2020 ***FILE SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: #1 Complaint (Referred), ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Calvin Lee Goddard (GLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goddard v. United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Calvin Lee Goddard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?