Bradley v. Gomez et al
| Edward Lee Bradley, Jr. |
| Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land, Rhonda Jones, John Doe, Pamela Kerey, H. Privett, Durham, Lawson, Carrie Cunnagin, Norris, King, Neil Stephens, Gadberry, Combs and John and Jane Does |
| 6:2023cv00149 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY Jan R. Waddell, Sr. by Clerk re: L.R. 83 - Attorney Admission procedures w/ a copy of L.R. 83.1 and 83.2. (KJA) |
| Case no longer referred to P SO pursuant to GFVT Chambers. (KJA) |
| Conflict Check run. (KJA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO ( Filing fee $402; receipt number 300000372.), filed by Edward Lee Bradley, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(KJA) |
| Clerk's Note: The Clerk notes a Complaint was filed; however, a summons was not provided to the Clerk for issuance. If you desire summons to be issued, the forms are available on the Court's website, www.kyed.uscourts.gov. A summons may be issued by presenting the prepared summons to the Clerk for issuance on paper or by electronically filing a Notice of Filing with the prepared summons as an attachment within 7 calendar days. COR Jan R. Waddell via U.SM Mail. (KJA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
