Cases 1 - 10 of 100
K Durham Law PLLC et al v. Shaw et al
as 2:2026cv05171
Defendant:
AZ Injury Care LLC, Bradley Shaw, Valley Spinal Care PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
K Durham Law PLLC and Kelley N Durham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interpleader
Chen v. Durham, et al
as 26-3160
Plaintiff:
GUOQING CHEN
Defendant:
DIANNE DURHAM and AKINLOLU O. OJO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Garrett v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 1:2026cv02019
Plaintiff:
Lundes Garrett
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Lt. Kyle Kutz and Lt. Danea L. Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2026cv02019
Plaintiff:
Lundes Garrett
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Lt. Kyle Kutz and Lt. Danea L. Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv61962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311 Uniformed Service Employment or Reemployment Rights Act - Discrimination
Jones v. Gruveer et al
as 6:2026cv00344
Plaintiff:
Juan T Jones
Defendant:
L Gruveer, P A Berry, S Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leachman v. Faith et al
as 3:2026cv00533
Plaintiff:
LaRay Lewis Leachman
Defendant:
Johnathan A. Faith, Kimberly A. Damon, Amanda R. Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Martin et al
as 3:2026cv00946
Plaintiff:
Neiman Collins
Defendant:
C/O Martin, Sgt. Stover and C/O Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Durham et al
as 5:2026cv00078
Plaintiff:
Paul Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Sheila K. Durham and Alanea Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
