Cases 1 - 10 of 60
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent:
EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARRERO v. BANK OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
TITO E. MARRERO
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, JENIFER WRIGHT, SHARON MIDDLEBROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. JONES et al
as 1:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
ZACARIAH JONES, CHAD BLAES, TANNER EARLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. DURHAM, JR.
Defendant:
DENNID REAGLE, YOLANDA CHAMBERS and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Durham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DURHAM v. ROSSER et al
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
DEREK DURHAM
Defendant:
BRADLEY ROSSER, ROBBIE FEE, WILLIAM AMMERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
LEONARD BAKER and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
