Williams v. Swaney
| Steven Williams, Jr. |
| G. Swaney |
| 6:2023cv00214 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to U.S. Attorney EDKY re #5 Order. (MM) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT to Warden at FCI Manchester re #5 Order(JCP) |
Filing 5
ORDER: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of Mr. Williamss Petition [R. 1] and thisOrder by certified mail to both (a) the Defendant, Warden Swaney of the Federal CorrectionalInstitution in Manchester, Kentucky, and (b) the United States Attorney for the Eastern Districtof Kentucky;2. Within sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order, the Defendant shall file aresponse to Williamss Petition. That response shall address the factual allegations and legalclaims contained in the Petition. The Defendant shall include as attachments any documentaryevidence relevant to Mr. Williamss claims or his response. The Defendant shall also addressany and all procedural or other defenses applicable to the Petition; 3. Within thirty (30) days after the Defendant files his response, Williams may file areply brief in further support of his Petition; and4. Once the foregoing time periods have passed, Mr. Williamss Petition will standsubmitted for a decision by this Court.. Signed by Judge Gregory F. VanTatenhove on 12/12/2023.(MM)cc: CORand Steven Williams Jr. by US Mail, Certified Mail (w/ Petition) to Dft and US Atty for EDKY
|
| Filing 4 Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 600000927 (JCP) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #4 Filing Fee Received (JCP) |
| Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(APR) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Steven Williams, Jr., pro se. No fee or IFP motion received. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Mailing envelope, front and back, postmarked 11/30/2023)(APR) |
| Conflict Check run. (APR) |
| ***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (APR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Swaney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Steven Williams, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: G. Swaney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
