Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Lora v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Jose Lora
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dupont v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Omega Demetrius Dupont
Respondent:
G Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tyrone Price v. Gary Swaney, et al
as 23-6114
Plaintiff:
TYRONE PRICE
Defendant:
G. SWANEY, Warden of F.C.I. Manchester, JOHN DOE, Being Sued as Manager of F.C.I. Manchester, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
BARRY v. INCH et al
as 1:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
BRANDIE LEE BARRY and RANDY CLAYTON BARRY
Consolidated Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RILEY, SANDRA BLEVINS, JAMIE A. MADDOX and others
Defendant:
MARK S INCH, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00214
Petitioner:
Steven Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00190
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and Damon Steven Lewis
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Swaney et al
as 6:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Price
Defendant:
G. Swaney, John Doe and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00153
Petitioner:
Damon S. Lewis and D-Bo
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
DEONDRE CORDELL HIGGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LEE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Price v. Swaney
as 6:2023cv00078
Petitioner:
Tyrone Price
Respondent:
G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
