Armstrong v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium et al
| Kendrick Armstrong |
| Unknown Employees Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, Millicks, Lee, Wright, Unknown Special Housing Unit Officer, Special Housing Unit Medical Staff, Special Housing Unit Psychology Staff and Unknown Defendants |
| 1:2013cv00596 |
| March 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana |
| Alexandria Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Dee D Drell |
| James D Kirk |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 24 Report and Recommendations re 1 2 8 Complaint. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Bivens claims be DENIED AND DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A. Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 05/27/14. (crt,Guillot, M)
|
|
Filing
20
JUDGMENT AND ORDER adopting in part 16 Report and Recommendations ORDERING that plaintiff's FTCA claims are DENIED and DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff amend his Bivens complaint within THIRTY (30) DAYS from th e date of issuance of this order or face dismissal of same. Should plaintiff so amend, the matter is then referred to the magistrate judge again for review and issuance of report and recommendation. ` Signed by Judge James T Trimble, Jr on 01/13/14. (crt,Guillot, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
