CHOATE v. MERRILL et al
Plaintiff: BRENDA CHOATE
Defendant: BOBBY LEE BEARD
Cross_defendant: BOBBY LEE BEARD
Case Number: 1:2008cv00049
Filed: February 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER adopting 170 Report and Recommended Decision for 116 Motion to Dismiss filed by CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICE; granting 116 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 171 Report and Recommended Decision for 118 Motion to Dismiss filed by JAMES O' ;FARRELL, MARTIN MAGNUSSON, NELSON REILLY and JEFFREY MERRILL and 119 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by JAMES O'FARRELL; granting 118 Motion to Dismiss; granting 119 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 172 Report and Recommended Dec ision for 122 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by MICHAEL PETERS; granting 122 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 173 Report and Recommended Decision for 130 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by BOBBY LEE BEARD; denying 130 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
October 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 173 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 130 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by BOBBY LEE BEARD. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER adopting 168 Report and Recommended Decision for 126 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment; granting 126 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment filed by COREY ROBINSON. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 168 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 126 MOTION to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment filed by COREY ROBINSON. Objections to R&R due by 9/21/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
May 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER granting in part 87 Motion to Amend. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT Document, which has been identified as Version 4.2 and is currently located at Doc. No. 94-5. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHOATE v. MERRILL et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRENDA CHOATE
Represented By: ANDREWS B. CAMPBELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOBBY LEE BEARD
Represented By: DAVID S. BISCHOFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: BOBBY LEE BEARD
Represented By: DAVID S. BISCHOFF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?