KS v. COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff: KS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Case Number: 1:2008cv00199
Filed: June 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Civil Rights: Welfare Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: GEORGE Z. SINGAL
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1396 - Tort Negligence

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting 15 Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissing Case without prejudice. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KS v. COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KS
Represented By: JACK B. COMART
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Represented By: JAMES E. FORTIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?