ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE COMMISSIONER
| WILDLIFE ALLIANCE OF MAINE and ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE |
| MAINE DEPARTMENT OF INLAND FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE COMMISSIONER |
| DANA JOHNSON, SR, CARL GUAY, DONALD DUDLEY, NATIONAL TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, FUR TAKERS OF AMERICA, MAINE TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION and US SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION |
| 1:2008cv00267 |
| August 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Environmental Matters Office |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 16:1538 Endangered Species Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
111
AMENDED ORDER denying 107 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 109 Motion for TRO. This Amended Order corrects typographical errors contained in the Order issued earlier today (Docket # 110). Please see footnote one of this Order for the corrections. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER denying 63 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 36 Motion for Leave to File Rebuttal Declarations. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
