MARINO v. COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
TINO MARINO |
COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NOVA HIRSCH, RYAN KENYAN, REGIS PREVOT, JAMES O'FARREL, JR, JEFFREY KING, JEFFREY MERRILL, CLARENCE TRIPP and JAMES O'FARREL, SR |
1:2008cv00326 |
September 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 198 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 87 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 153 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 180 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 153 Report and Recommendations; granting 87 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 48 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE A LATE ANSWER granting 44 Motion to Set Aside ; granting 45 Motion for Leave to File late answer. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 36 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 34 Report and Recommendations; ORDER denying 24 Motion to Dismiss. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 34 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 24 MOTION to Dismiss filed by JEFFREY KING. Objections to R&R due by 5/15/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.