EMK INC v. FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC CO
Plaintiff: EMK INC
Defendant: FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC CO
Case Number: 1:2008cv00383
Filed: November 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER granting 22 Motion in Limine to Exclude Hearsay Statements; granting in part 23 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence that Federal Pacific No Longer Actively Manufactures Products. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EMK INC v. FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC CO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMK INC
Represented By: JEFFREY T. EDWARDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL PACIFIC ELECTRIC CO
Represented By: HILLARY J. BOUCHARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?