VICINO v. SHAW
Plaintiff: ROBERT J VICINO
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER SHAW
Case Number: 1:2009cv00417
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Complaint; dismissing 1 Complaint filed by ROBERT J. VICINO. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 1 Complaint filed by ROBERT J VICINO. Objections to R&R due by 10/23/2009. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VICINO v. SHAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBERT J VICINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER SHAW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?