SCHMIDT v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: JAMES F SCHMIDT
Respondent: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Case Number: 1:2010cv00349
Filed: August 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: JOHN A. WOODCOCK
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER adopting 5 Report and Recommended Decision for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JAMES F SCHMIDT; denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCHMIDT v. CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES F SCHMIDT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DOWNEAST CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?