WYMAN v. MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER
JOHN WYMAN |
MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER |
1:2010cv00465 |
November 9, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Bangor Office |
Penobscot |
MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 52 Report and Recommendations and 16 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (lrc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WYMAN v. MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JOHN WYMAN | |
Represented By: | RANDY L. ROBINSON |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: MAINEGENERAL MEDICAL CENTER | |
Represented By: | JAMES R. ERWIN |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.