SIROIS v. CICHON et al
| RICKY LEE SIROIS |
| AL CICHON, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CARMEN MULLHOLLAND and CLUKEY, CAPTAIN |
| 1:2012cv00028 |
| January 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Penobscot |
| D. BROCK HORNBY |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER granting 133 Motion for Summary Judgment. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER OF RECUSAL. JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY recused. Case reassigned to JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR for all further proceedings. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION overruling 82 Objection. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER ON APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER overruling 69 Appeal from Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court - By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 54 Report and Recommendations for 43 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CLUKEY, CAPTAIN. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 31 Appeal from Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
