BANKERS BANK NORTHEAST V. AYER et al
BANKERS' BANK NORTHEAST |
EVERETT L. AYER, RICHARD L. GOODWIN, AL C. GRACEFFA, GEORGE W. HESELTON, DANIEL F. HOLLINGDALE, ROBERT P. LACASSE, ARTHUR C. MARKOS, PAUL F. MCCLAY, JOHN G. RIZZO and BERRY DUNN MCNEIL & PARKER LLC |
1:2012cv00127 |
April 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Bangor Office |
XX Outside the State |
MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 274 MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION FOR TIME AND BILLING RECORDS By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (lrc) |
Filing 238 ORDER ON LOCAL RULE 44 OBJECTION, terminating 209 Objection. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP) |
Filing 172 ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND granting 168 Motion to Amend. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the AMENDED COMPLAINT Document. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 167 ORDER & REPORT OF CONFERENCE By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) |
Filing 151 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 83 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 135 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 143 Report and Recommendations. ; denying 148 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing; denying 149 Motion for Oral Argument/Hearing By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc) Modified on 9/4/2012 to create relationship to motion #83 for summary judgment(lrc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.