FLOOD v. BARNHART

FLOOD v. BARNHART

Petitioner:	ANDREW FLOOD
Respondent:	PATRICIA BARNHART
Case Number:	1:2012cv00174
Filed:	May 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Maine
Office:	Bangor Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	D. BROCK HORNBY
Presiding Judge:	JOHN H. RICH
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 7, 2012	Filing 39 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 4 ; granting 30 Motion for Adjudication; mooting 31 Motion for Hearing; mooting 33 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)
October 9, 2012	Filing 25 ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 4 Report and Recommendations for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; mooting 3 MOTION for Transcripts, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, denying 8 Sealed Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing to Prove Actual Innocence, denying 13 Sealed Motion to Amend Habeas Petition. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 7, 2012

Filing 39 ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE re: 4 ; granting 30 Motion for Adjudication; mooting 31 Motion for Hearing; mooting 33 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (dfr)

October 9, 2012

Filing 25 ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 4 Report and Recommendations for 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; mooting 3 MOTION for Transcripts, MOTION to Appoint Counsel, denying 8 Sealed Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing to Prove Actual Innocence, denying 13 Sealed Motion to Amend Habeas Petition. No Certificate of Appealability should issue because there is no substantial issue that could be presented on appeal. See Fed.R.App.P.22 and Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Proceedings Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 or Section 2255. See also First Circuit Local Rule 22.0. By JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY. (mnw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FLOOD v. BARNHART
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: PATRICIA BARNHART
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: ANDREW FLOOD
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?