GOODWIN v. MEDPRO

Plaintiff: MICHAEL R GOODWIN
Defendant: MEDPRO
Case Number: 1:2012cv00371
Filed: December 7, 2012
Court: Maine District Court
Office: Bangor Office
County: Knox
Referring Judge: MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK
Presiding Judge: GEORGE Z. SINGAL
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 9, 2014 84 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION denying 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
October 25, 2013 56 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)
September 18, 2013 51 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OF DECISION granting 36 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK. (CWP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GOODWIN v. MEDPRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MICHAEL R GOODWIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEDPRO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?