SAUNDERS et al v. GETCHELL AGENCY INC et al
| KRISTOPHER T SAUNDERS and CORY A SCRIBNER |
| GETCHELL AGENCY INC and RENA GETCHELL |
| 1:2013cv00244 |
| July 3, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Penobscot |
| MARGARET J. KRAVCHUK |
| JOHN A. WOODCOCK |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE granting 129 Motion for Approval of Notice to Class Members ; adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 132 Report and Recommendations. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (lrc)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER ON THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE- re:adopting Report and Recommended Decision re 97 Report and Recommendations; 81 Motion to Certify Class; 82 Motion to Certify Class. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (mjlt)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting 34 Motion to Conditionally Certify Class By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (jgw)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 37 Defendants' Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, dismissing the claims of Plaintiff Kristopher Saunders without prejudice and dismissing the Maine state law claim under 26 ME. REV. STAT. Section 664(3) against Defendant Rena Getchell. By JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. (MFS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
