SADULSKY v. TOWN OF WINSLOW et al
| WILLIAM P SADULSKY |
| TOWN OF WINSLOW, WINSLOW POLICE DEPARTMENT, HALEY L FLEMING, MICHAEL J MICHAUD and JOSHUA VEILLUEX |
| 1:2014cv00001 |
| January 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Kennebec |
| JOHN H. RICH |
| GEORGE Z. SINGAL |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
138
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 136 Bill of Costs (Costs Taxed in amount of $ 2686.85 against Plaintiffs) By CLERK OF COURT, Christa K. Berry. (ems)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 85 Motion in Limine to Preclude Plaintiffs from Introducing Evidence of Taser Manufacturer's Recommendations; mooting in part granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion in Limine to Preclude Testimony from Plaintiffs' Witnesses not Present at Incident; granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Expert Testmony of Melvin Tucker. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN H. RICH III. (jlg)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 55 Report and Recommendations and granting in part 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (MSH)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER IN OF PRE-FILING CONFERENCE - Joint Stipulated Record due by 3/10/2015; Motion for Summary Judgment due by 3/20/2015, response due by 4/10/2015, reply due by 4/24/2015. By JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL. (lrc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
