MACHIAVELLI v. ABBOTT JR et al
| ANTHONY MACHIAVELLI |
| HAROLD ABBOTT JR, TROY ROSS, ANTONIO MENDEZ and BRITTANY PAYSON |
| 1:2015cv00340 |
| August 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| Bangor Office |
| Knox |
| JON D. LEVY |
| JOHN C. NIVISON |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION denying 89 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 89 Motion to Extend Time; denying 93 Objection to Scheduling Order By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (nrg)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 86 Report and Recommendations; granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
|
|
Filing
86
REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by ANTONIO MENDEZ, RANDALL LIBERTY, HAROLD ABBOTT JR, TROY ROSS. Objections to R&R due by 4/18/2017. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part 41 Motion to supplement pleadings By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (CWP)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 45 Appeal of Magistrate Judge's Decision By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (akr)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE adopting 13 Report and Recommendations; denying 11 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 11 Motion for TRO. By JUDGE JON D. LEVY. (nwd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
