VEILLEUX et al v. ELECTRICITY MAINE LLC et al
KATHERINE VEILLEUX and JENNIFER CHON |
ELECTRICITY MAINE LLC, PROVIDER POWER LLC, SPARK HOLDCO LLC, KEVIN DEAN and EMILE CLAVET |
1:2016cv00571 |
November 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Bangor Office |
Kennebec |
JOHN H. RICH |
NANCY TORRESEN |
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 249 AMENDED ORDER ON FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND ATTORNEYS' FEES AND EXPENSES granting 248 Motion to Amend. By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (CJD) |
Filing 247 ORDER ON FINAL SETTLEMENT APPROVAL AND ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPENSES granting 236 Motion for Approval of Settlement; granting 238 Motion for Attorney Fees By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (CJD) |
Filing 235 ORDER APPROVING PLAINTIFFS' UOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT granting 232 Motion for Approval of Settlement By JUDGE LANCE E. WALKER. (CJD) |
Filing 49 ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND - granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 37 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. REMINDER: After entry of this Order, if Amending a COMPLAINT, counsel are REQUIRED to separately file the SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Document on the court's docket. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.