GARCIA, MD v. MAINEGENERAL HEALTH
Plaintiff: PETER GARCIA
Defendant: MAINEGENERAL HEALTH
Case Number: 1:2018cv00019
Filed: January 12, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Office: Bangor Office
County: Kennebec
Presiding Judge: JOHN H. RICH
Presiding Judge: NANCY TORRESEN
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RECONSIDER - granting 23 Motion for Reconsideration but denying relief. By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (mnw)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION granting 20 Motion for Leave to File; granting 9 Motion to Dismiss By JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN. (slg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARCIA, MD v. MAINEGENERAL HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PETER GARCIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAINEGENERAL HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?