GANTS v. PROBST ELECTRIC INC et al
AMY GANTS |
QUANTA SERVICES INC and PROBST ELECTRIC INC |
1:2018cv00257 |
June 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Maine |
Bangor Office |
Waldo |
JOHN H RICH |
NANCY TORRESEN |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: REMOVAL: State Court Record due by 7/6/2018. By DEPUTY CLERK: J. Driscoll. (jgd) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by PROBST ELECTRIC INC, QUANTA SERVICES INC. (jgd) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (jgd) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DANIELLE Y. VANDERZANDEN on behalf of PROBST ELECTRIC INC, QUANTA SERVICES INC. (jgd) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with State Court Pleadings Complaint and Exhibit A PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS., filed by PROBST ELECTRIC INC, QUANTA SERVICES INC. (Service of Process Deadline 9/27/2018) Fee due by 7/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit A- Pay Stubs, #3 Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal to Plaintiff's Counsel)(jgd) |
Set Answer Deadline per Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 81(c) for PROBST ELECTRIC INC and QUANTA SERVICES INC: Answer due by 7/6/2018. (jgd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.