JOURNET v. MAGNUSSON
| MICHAEL JOURNET |
| MATTHEW MAGNUSSON |
| MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES |
| 1:2019cv00226 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JON D LEVY |
| JOHN C NIVISON |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPLY to ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MICHAEL JOURNET. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tcs) (With permission from mjlt Attachment 1 replaced with correct envelope on 7/11/2019) |
| Filing 4 STATE COURT RECORD in paper by MATTHEW MAGNUSSON. (jwr) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER/RESPONSE/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MATTHEW MAGNUSSON. Reply due by 7/8/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Record)(MACOMBER, DONALD) |
Filing 2
ORDER TO ANSWER #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 7/22/2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by MICHAEL JOURNET. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(bfa) |
| Filing Fee Received from MICHAEL JOURNET: Amount Paid: $5.00. Receipt Number: 119000212. Method of Payment: check. Purpose of Payment: civil filing fee. Date Paid: 5/20/2019 re #1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (bfa) Modified on 5/21/2019 to correct filing date(bfa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
