BAKER v. ESTES et al
Plaintiff: KARON E BAKER
Defendant: SHAWN PIERCE and DETECTIVE MATTHEW I ESTES
Case Number: 1:2019cv00244
Filed: May 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maine
Presiding Judge: JOHN C NIVISON
Referring Judge: NANCY TORRESEN
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2019 Filing 11 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint filed by KARON E BAKER (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mnw)
July 25, 2019 Filing 10 Objection to Report and Recommended Decision re #9 Report and Recommended Decision filed by KARON E BAKER. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Envelope)(mnw)
July 10, 2019 Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDED DECISION re #1 Complaint filed by KARON E BAKER. Objections to R&R due by 7/24/2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
June 7, 2019 Filing 8 LETTER from the Clerk's Office RE Collection of Fees. (clp)
June 6, 2019 Filing 7 INDICATION by Prisoner KARON E BAKER of Intent to Proceed; Prison Business office notified. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(clp)
May 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's intent to proceed due 6/20/2019. By MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN C. NIVISON. (MFS)
May 31, 2019 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Prisoner Intent to Proceed Deadline 6/20/2019. (MFS)
May 30, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by KARON E BAKER. Although the Clerk's Office has no obligation to review pleadings for personal identifiers, please note that the above-referenced document contains personal identifiers in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1. This will be the only Notice of Violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 or Fed.R.Crim.P. 49.1 you will receive in this case. The filing party may remedy this violation by filing a redacted version of the document adding REDACTED to the top of the filing along with, a Motion to Seal the previously filed unredacted document. If no action is taken, the unredacted document will remain publicly available. (sfw)
May 30, 2019 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KARON E BAKER (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Account, #2 Trust Account Statement)(sfw)
May 30, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Pro Se Appearance form filed by KARON E BAKER (sfw)
May 30, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (sfw)
May 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MATTHEW I ESTES, SHAWN PIERCE, filed by KARON E BAKER. (Service of Process Deadline 8/28/2019) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(sfw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BAKER v. ESTES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KARON E BAKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAWN PIERCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DETECTIVE MATTHEW I ESTES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?